Hill v. Hill
553 S.E.2d 679, 354 N.C. 348, 2001 N.C. LEXIS 1078
Opinion
For the reasons stated in section one of the dissenting opinion by Judge Tyson, the decision of the Court of Appeals is reversed and this case is remanded to that court to address defendants’ remaining assignments of error.
REVERSED AND REMANDED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Hill v. Hill, 553 S.E.2d 679, 354 N.C. 348, 2001 N.C. LEXIS 1078 (N.C. 2001).
553 S.E.2d 679 (Hill v. Hill) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Fuhs v. Fuhs
782 S.E.2d 385 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2016)
Martin v. Parker
563 S.E.2d 216 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2002)