Hill v. Hill

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Hill v. Hill

570 S.E.2d 508, 356 N.C. 301

CourtSupreme Court of North Carolina

DecidedOctober 3, 2002

DocketNo. 688P01

StatusPublished

This text of 570 S.E.2d 508 (Hill v. Hill) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hill v. Hill, 570 S.E.2d 508, 356 N.C. 301 (N.C. 2002).

Pincite

Opinion

Motion by defendants (Garford Hill, Jewell Hill, Barbara Garrison and William Garrison) to dismiss appeal for lack of substantial constitutional question allowed 3 October 2002. Eetition by plaintiff for discretionary review pursuant to G.S. 7A-31 denied 3 October 2002. Motion by plaintiff for summary remand denied 3 October 2002. Motion by plaintiff not to remove Hon. Mark D. Martin denied 3 October 2002.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Motion by defendants (Garford Hill, Jewell Hill, Barbara Garrison and William Garrison) to dismiss appeal for lack of substantial constitutional question allowed 3 October 2002. Eetition by plaintiff for discretionary review pursuant to G.S. 7A-31 denied 3 October 2002. Motion by plaintiff for summary remand denied 3 October 2002. Motion by plaintiff not to remove Hon. Mark D. Martin denied 3 October 2002.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

570 S.E.2d 508, 356 N.C. 301, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hill-v-hill-nc-2002.