Hijar v. Burrus

474 U.S. 816, 106 S. Ct. 59, 88 L. Ed. 2d 48, 54 U.S.L.W. 3223, 1985 U.S. LEXIS 3191
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided October 7, 1985·No. No. 84-1736·Published·Cited by 62 cases

Opinion

C. A. 9th Cir. Motion of respondent for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and certiorari granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hijar v. Burrus, 474 U.S. 816, 106 S. Ct. 59, 88 L. Ed. 2d 48, 54 U.S.L.W. 3223, 1985 U.S. LEXIS 3191 (1985).

474 U.S. 816 (Hijar v. Burrus) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

White v. State of Alabama
74 F.3d 1058 (Eleventh Circuit, 1996)
United States v. Bramer
43 M.J. 538 (Navy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals, 1995)
Fleenor v. State
514 N.E.2d 80 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1987)
Pacific West Cable Co. v. City of Sacramento, Cal.
672 F. Supp. 1322 (E.D. California, 1987)
State v. Burrus
729 P.2d 935 (Arizona Supreme Court, 1986)
State v. Hollingsworth
493 So. 2d 244 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1986)
State v. Harper
713 S.W.2d 7 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1986)
Daigle v. Coastal Marine, Inc.
488 So. 2d 679 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1986)
Streetman v. McCotter
634 F. Supp. 290 (E.D. Texas, 1986)
Funchess v. Wainwright
788 F.2d 1443 (Eleventh Circuit, 1986)
Funchess v. Wainwright
486 So. 2d 592 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1986)
Thomas v. Wainwright
788 F.2d 684 (Eleventh Circuit, 1986)
State v. Ford
489 So. 2d 1250 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1986)
State v. Williams
490 N.E.2d 906 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1986)