Hight v. Wilson

Supreme Court

Hight v. Wilson

1 U.S. 94, 1 Dall. 94

CourtSupreme Court of the United States

DecidedJanuary 1, 1784

StatusPublished

Cited by8 cases

This text of 1 U.S. 94 (Hight v. Wilson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hight v. Wilson, 1 U.S. 94, 1 Dall. 94 (1784).

Pincite

Opinion

The Chief Justice,

in his charge to the jury, informed them, 1st. That it was not necessary that a will, devising real estate in this Commonwealth, should be sealed. 2d. Nor that all the subscribing witnesses should prove the execution. 3d. Nor that the proof of the will should be made by those who subscribed as witnesses. 4th. Nor that the will should be subscribed by the witnesses. †

†

See post. Lewis Appellant versus Maris Appellee.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The Chief Justice,

in his charge to the jury, informed them, 1st. That it was not necessary that a will, devising real estate in this Commonwealth, should be sealed. 2d. Nor that all the subscribing witnesses should prove the execution. 3d. Nor that the proof of the will should be made by those who subscribed as witnesses. 4th. Nor that the will should be subscribed by the witnesses. †

†

See post. Lewis Appellant versus Maris Appellee.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1 U.S. 94, 1 Dall. 94, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hight-v-wilson-scotus-1784.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack