Higgins v. Dewey

107 Mass. 494
CourtMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
DecidedSeptember 15, 1871
StatusPublished
Cited by46 cases

This text of 107 Mass. 494 (Higgins v. Dewey) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Higgins v. Dewey, 107 Mass. 494 (Mass. 1871).

Opinion

Gray, J.

The instructions requested were rightly refused, and the instructions given were correct and sufficient. A man who negligently sets fire on his-own land, and keeps it negligently, is liable to an action at common law for any injury done by the spreading or communication of the fire directly from his own land to the property of another, whether through the air or along the ground, and whether he might or might not have reasonably anticipated the particular manner and direction in which it is actually communicated. Tubervil v. Stamp, 1 Salk. 13; 2 Salk. 726; 1 Ld. Raym. 264; 3 Ld. Raym. 375; Com. 32; Comb. 459; Skin. 681; 12 Mod. 152; Carth. 425; Holt, 9. Filliter v. Phippard, 11 Q. B. 347. Barnard v. Poor, 21 Pick. 378. Perley v. Eastern Railroad Co. 98 Mass. 414.

The testimony of Wells was rightly excluded, because it related to an immaterial question, and to a subject within the common knowledge of the jury. White v. Ballou, 8 Allen, 408. Luce v. Dorchester Insurance Co. 105 Mass. 297.

Pxeeptions overruled.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Commonwealth v. Rhoades
401 N.E.2d 342 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1980)
Commonwealth v. Harris
295 N.E.2d 687 (Massachusetts Appeals Court, 1973)
Deerfoot Farms, Inc. v. New York, New Haven & Hartford Railroad
96 N.E.2d 872 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1951)
Gibson v. Garcia
216 P.2d 119 (California Court of Appeal, 1950)
Newlin v. New England Telephone & Telegraph Co.
54 N.E.2d 929 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1944)
Phillips v. Batchelder Whittemore Coal Co.
4 Mass. App. Div. 221 (Mass. Dist. Ct., App. Div., 1939)
Herrick v. City of Springfield
192 N.E. 626 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1934)
Bratton v. Rudnick
186 N.E. 669 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1933)
Gates v. Boston & Maine Railroad
151 N.E. 320 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1926)
Kansas City, M. & O. Ry. Co. v. Blackstone
217 S.W. 208 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1919)
Houston v. Elrod
81 So. 831 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1919)
Casson v. Schoenfeld
166 N.W. 23 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1918)
Bradford v. Boston & Maine Railroad
225 Mass. 129 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1916)
Ogden v. Aspinwall
107 N.E. 448 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1915)
White v. Sharpe
107 N.E. 56 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1914)
Commonwealth v. Rodziewicz
99 N.E. 574 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1912)
Wallace v. New York, New Haven, & Hartford Railroad
94 N.E. 306 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1911)
Brady v. Kansas City, St. Louis & Chicago Railroad
102 S.W. 978 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1907)
Mahaffey v. J. L. Rumbarger Lumber Co.
56 S.E. 893 (West Virginia Supreme Court, 1907)
Harrison v. Kansas City Electric Light Co.
93 S.W. 951 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1906)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
107 Mass. 494, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/higgins-v-dewey-mass-1871.