Hicks v. State

876 So. 2d 701, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 10033, 2004 WL 1637019
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided June 29, 2004·No. No. 5D03-1260·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(b)(2)(A)(ii); Leonard v. State, 760 So.2d 114 (Fla.2000); Chambers v. State, 840 So.2d 335 (Fla. 1st DCA 2003); Winther v. State, 812 So.2d 527 (Fla. 4th DCA 2002).

PLEUS, MONACO and TORPY, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hicks v. State, 876 So. 2d 701, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 10033, 2004 WL 1637019 (Fla. Ct. App. 2004).

876 So. 2d 701 (Hicks v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Wright v. State
876 So. 2d 701 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2004)