Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Hicks v. State

Hicks v. State

874 So. 2d 699, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 7554, 2004 WL 1176154
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Hicks v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 852 So. 2d 954 →
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided May 28, 2004·No. No. 1D03-0946·Published

Opinions

PER CURIAM.

The evidence did not establish that appellant was guilty of a willful and substantial violation of the terms of her probation. See Van Wagner v. State, 677 So.2d 314, 316 (Fla. 1st DCA 1996). Appellant’s sentence and the order revoking her probation are reversed and the case is remanded with directions that probation be reinstated.

Reversed and remanded.

BENTON, J., concurs, PADOVANO, J., concurs with opinion, and WEBSTER, J., dissents with opinion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hicks v. State, 874 So. 2d 699, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 7554, 2004 WL 1176154 (Fla. Ct. App. 2004).

874 So. 2d 699 (Hicks v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Riggins v. State
830 So. 2d 920 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2002)
Van Wagner v. State
677 So. 2d 314 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1996)
Hemingway v. State
762 So. 2d 957 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2000)