Hicks v. State
874 So. 2d 699, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 7554, 2004 WL 1176154
This text of 874 So. 2d 699 (Hicks v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Hicks v. State, 874 So. 2d 699, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 7554, 2004 WL 1176154 (Fla. Ct. App. 2004).
Opinions
The evidence did not establish that appellant was guilty of a willful and substantial violation of the terms of her probation. See Van Wagner v. State, 677 So.2d 314, 316 (Fla. 1st DCA 1996). Appellant’s sentence and the order revoking her probation are reversed and the case is remanded with directions that probation be reinstated.
Reversed and remanded.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Riggins v. State
830 So. 2d 920 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2002)
Van Wagner v. State
677 So. 2d 314 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1996)
Hemingway v. State
762 So. 2d 957 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2000)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
874 So. 2d 699, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 7554, 2004 WL 1176154, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hicks-v-state-fladistctapp-2004.