Hickman v. Young
144 A.D.2d 900, 535 N.Y.S.2d 574, 1988 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14342
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided November 15, 1988·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
Order unanimously affirmed with costs. Memorandum: Plaintiff’s complaints sufficiently plead causes of action against defendant in his individual capacity (see, Alifieris v American Airlines, 63 NY2d 370). Thus, Supreme Court did not err in denying defendant’s motions to dismiss the complaints for failure to state a cause of action (CPLR 3211 [a] [7]; see, Foley v D’Agostino, 21 AD2d 60). (Appeal from order of Supreme Court, Niagara County, Doyle, J. — dismiss complaint.) Present — Dillon, P. J., Doerr, Green, Pine and Lawton, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Hickman v. Young, 144 A.D.2d 900, 535 N.Y.S.2d 574, 1988 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14342 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1988).
144 A.D.2d 900 (Hickman v. Young) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Hickman v. Young
144 A.D.2d 901 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1988)