Hewlett-Packard Company v. Christopher Ainsworth and Danielle Ainsworth

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided September 24, 2015·No. 14-15-00107-CV·Published

Opinion

MANDATE

The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-15-00107-CV

Hewlett-Packard Company, Appellant Appealed from the 270th District Court of Harris County. (Tr. Ct. No. 2012- v. 21132). Opinion delivered Per Curiam. Christopher Ainsworth and Danielle Ainsworth, Appellee

TO THE 270TH DISTRICT COURT OF HARRIS COUNTY, GREETINGS:

Before our Court of Appeals on September 17, 2015, the cause upon appeal to revise or reverse your judgment was determined. Our Court of Appeals made its order in these words:

Today the Court heard the parties’ joint motion to dismiss the appeal from the judgment signed by the court below on November 19, 2014. Having considered the motion and found it meritorious, we order the appeal DISMISSED.

We further order that each party shall pay its costs by reason of this appeal. We further order the supersedeas bond posted by Hewlett-Packard Company released. We further order Westchester Fire Insurance Company, the surety on the supersedeas bond, released from liability and obligation on the bond. We further order that mandate be issued immediately. We further order this decision certified below for observance.

1 WHEREFORE, WE COMMAND YOU to observe the order of our said Court in this behalf and in all things have it duly recognized, obeyed, and executed. WITNESS, the Hon. Kem Thompson Frost, Chief Justice of our Fourteenth Court of Appeals, with the Seal thereof affixed, at the City of Houston, September 24, 2015.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hewlett-Packard Company v. Christopher Ainsworth and Danielle Ainsworth, (Tex. Ct. App. 2015).

Hewlett-Packard Company v. Christopher Ainsworth and Danielle Ainsworth (Hewlett-Packard Company v. Christopher Ainsworth and Danielle Ainsworth) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.