Hewlett-Packard Company v. Christopher Ainsworth and Danielle Ainsworth

Court of Appeals of Texas

Hewlett-Packard Company v. Christopher Ainsworth and Danielle Ainsworth

DecidedFebruary 5, 2015

Docket14-15-00107-CV

StatusPublished

This text of Hewlett-Packard Company v. Christopher Ainsworth and Danielle Ainsworth (Hewlett-Packard Company v. Christopher Ainsworth and Danielle Ainsworth) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hewlett-Packard Company v. Christopher Ainsworth and Danielle Ainsworth, (Tex. Ct. App. 2015).

Pincite

Opinion

FILED IN DATE 02-04-15 14th COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS NOTICE OF APPEALS 2/5/2015 10:57:50 AM ASSIGNMENT OF COURT THE COURT OF APPEALS CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE TO: 14TH COURT OF APPEALS Clerk

From: Deputy Clerk: PHYLLIS WASHINGTON Chris Daniel, District Clerk Harris County, T E X A S

CAUSE: 2012-21132

VOLUME PAGE OR IMAGE # 63290905

DUE 03-19-15 ATTORNEY TBN #13892950

NOTICE OF APPEAL HAS BEEN ASSIGNED TO THE 14TH

DATE ORDER SIGNED: 11-19-14

MOTION FOR NEW TRIAL/REQUEST FOR FINDINGS OF FACT DATE FILED 12-19-14

REQUEST TRANSCRIPT DATE FILED 02-04-15

NOTICE OF APPEAL DATE FILED 02-03-15

NUMBER OF DAYS: ( CLERKS RECORD ) 120 -POST JUDGMENT MOTION FILED FILE ORDERED: YES NO IMAGED FILED: YES NO

CODES FOR NOTICE OF APPEAL: BC , C, O

CHRIS DANIEL Harris County, District Clerk

By: /s/PHYLLIS WASHINGTON PHYLLIS WASHINGTON, Deputy

BC NOTICE OF APPEAL FILED BG NOTICE OF APPEAL FILED – GOVERNMENT C JUDGMENT BEING APPEALED D- ACCELERATED APPEAL OA NO CLERK’S RECORD REQUEST FILED O CLERK’S RECORD REQUEST FILED (W/NOTICE OF APPEAL) NA AMENDED NOTICE OF APPEAL

AP9 R04-30-92 S:\FormsLib\Civil Bureau\Civil Courts & Post Judgment\Post Trial\Appeal Status Card Revised 01-18-2013 JURN7 (NSA#) JUSTICE INFORMATION MANAGEMENT SYSTEM FEB 05, 2015(C1) INT6510 CIVIL CASE INTAKE OPT: _____ - INT GENERAL PARTY INQUIRY PAGE: 1 - 1

CASE NUM: 201221132__ PJN> __ TRANS NUM: _________ CURRENT COURT: 270 PUB? _ CASE TYPE: DAMAGES (OTH) CASE STATUS: DISPOSED (FINAL) STYLE: AINSWORTH, CHRISTOPHER VS HEWLETT-PACKARD COMPANY ============================================================================= **** INACTIVE PARTIES **** PJN PER/CONN COC BAR PERSON NAME PTY ASSOC. ATTY NUM NUMBER STAT _ 00004-0001 AGT HEWLETT-PACKARD COMPANY (DELAW _ 00003-0001 PLT 24012777 AINSWORTH, DANIELLE HAND, RYAN TH _ 00002-0001 DEF 13892950 HEWLETT-PACKARD COMPANY MEDACK, DAVID _ 00001-0001 PLT 24012777 AINSWORTH, CHRISTOPHER HAND, RYAN TH

==> (4) CONNECTION(S) FOUND 1=ACTIVE 2=ATY. INQ. 3=ACT.ENTRY 4=ISS. SERV. 5=DOC. INQ. 6=CASE INQ. 7=BACKWARD 8=FORWARD 9=PTY. ADDR. 10=REFRESH 11=HELP

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

FILED IN DATE 02-04-15 14th COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS NOTICE OF APPEALS 2/5/2015 10:57:50 AM ASSIGNMENT OF COURT THE COURT OF APPEALS CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE TO: 14TH COURT OF APPEALS Clerk

From: Deputy Clerk: PHYLLIS WASHINGTON Chris Daniel, District Clerk Harris County, T E X A S

CAUSE: 2012-21132

VOLUME PAGE OR IMAGE # 63290905

DUE 03-19-15 ATTORNEY TBN #13892950

NOTICE OF APPEAL HAS BEEN ASSIGNED TO THE 14TH

DATE ORDER SIGNED: 11-19-14

MOTION FOR NEW TRIAL/REQUEST FOR FINDINGS OF FACT DATE FILED 12-19-14

REQUEST TRANSCRIPT DATE FILED 02-04-15

NOTICE OF APPEAL DATE FILED 02-03-15

NUMBER OF DAYS: ( CLERKS RECORD ) 120 -POST JUDGMENT MOTION FILED FILE ORDERED: YES NO IMAGED FILED: YES NO

CODES FOR NOTICE OF APPEAL: BC , C, O

CHRIS DANIEL Harris County, District Clerk

By: /s/PHYLLIS WASHINGTON PHYLLIS WASHINGTON, Deputy

BC NOTICE OF APPEAL FILED BG NOTICE OF APPEAL FILED – GOVERNMENT C JUDGMENT BEING APPEALED D- ACCELERATED APPEAL OA NO CLERK’S RECORD REQUEST FILED O CLERK’S RECORD REQUEST FILED (W/NOTICE OF APPEAL) NA AMENDED NOTICE OF APPEAL

AP9 R04-30-92 S:\FormsLib\Civil Bureau\Civil Courts & Post Judgment\Post Trial\Appeal Status Card Revised 01-18-2013 JURN7 (NSA#) JUSTICE INFORMATION MANAGEMENT SYSTEM FEB 05, 2015(C1) INT6510 CIVIL CASE INTAKE OPT: _____ - INT GENERAL PARTY INQUIRY PAGE: 1 - 1

CASE NUM: 201221132__ PJN> __ TRANS NUM: _________ CURRENT COURT: 270 PUB? _ CASE TYPE: DAMAGES (OTH) CASE STATUS: DISPOSED (FINAL) STYLE: AINSWORTH, CHRISTOPHER VS HEWLETT-PACKARD COMPANY ============================================================================= **** INACTIVE PARTIES **** PJN PER/CONN COC BAR PERSON NAME PTY ASSOC. ATTY NUM NUMBER STAT _ 00004-0001 AGT HEWLETT-PACKARD COMPANY (DELAW _ 00003-0001 PLT 24012777 AINSWORTH, DANIELLE HAND, RYAN TH _ 00002-0001 DEF 13892950 HEWLETT-PACKARD COMPANY MEDACK, DAVID _ 00001-0001 PLT 24012777 AINSWORTH, CHRISTOPHER HAND, RYAN TH

==> (4) CONNECTION(S) FOUND 1=ACTIVE 2=ATY. INQ. 3=ACT.ENTRY 4=ISS. SERV. 5=DOC. INQ. 6=CASE INQ. 7=BACKWARD 8=FORWARD 9=PTY. ADDR. 10=REFRESH 11=HELP

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

Hewlett-Packard Company v. Christopher Ainsworth and Danielle Ainsworth, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hewlett-packard-company-v-christopher-ainsworth-and-danielle-ainsworth-texapp-2015.