Hewlett-Packard Company v. Christopher Ainsworth and Danielle Ainsworth

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided September 17, 2015·No. 14-15-00107-CV·Published

Opinion

September 17, 2015

JUDGMENT

The Fourteenth Court of Appeals HEWLETT-PACKARD COMPANY, Appellant

NO. 14-15-00107-CV V.

CHRISTOPHER AINSWORTH AND DANIELLE AINSWORTH, Appellee ________________________________

Today the Court heard the parties’ joint motion to dismiss the appeal from the judgment signed by the court below on November 19, 2014. Having considered the motion and found it meritorious, we order the appeal DISMISSED.

We further order that each party shall pay its costs by reason of this appeal. We further order the supersedeas bond posted by Hewlett-Packard Company released. We further order Westchester Fire Insurance Company, the surety on the supersedeas bond, released from liability and obligation on the bond. We further order that mandate be issued immediately. We further order this decision certified below for observance.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hewlett-Packard Company v. Christopher Ainsworth and Danielle Ainsworth, (Tex. Ct. App. 2015).

Hewlett-Packard Company v. Christopher Ainsworth and Danielle Ainsworth (Hewlett-Packard Company v. Christopher Ainsworth and Danielle Ainsworth) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.