Hesse v. Brown
This text of 7 Vet. App. 126 (Hesse v. Brown) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
ORDER
On October 13, 1994, the parties filed a joint motion requesting that the stay in this [127]*127ease be lifted and asking that judgment be entered against the appellant as the appellant concedes would be required under the decisions of the Court in Zevalkink v. Brown, 6 Vet.App. 483 (1994), and Landicho v. Brown, 7 Vet.App. 42 (1994) (consolidated with Oseo v. Brown, No. 92-90).
On consideration of the foregoing, it is
ORDERED that the appeal is DISMISSED. It is further
ORDERED that judgment will be entered on the date of this order. Pursuant to Rule 41(b) of the Court’s Rules of Practice and Procedure, this order constitutes the mandate of this Court.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
7 Vet. App. 126, 1994 U.S. Vet. App. LEXIS 871, 1994 WL 587638, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hesse-v-brown-cavc-1994.