Hesse v. Brown

Veterans Claims

Hesse v. Brown

7 Vet. App. 126, 1994 U.S. Vet. App. LEXIS 871, 1994 WL 587638

United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims·Decided October 26, 1994·No. No. 90-763·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

On October 13, 1994, the parties filed a joint motion requesting that the stay in this [127] ease be lifted and asking that judgment be entered against the appellant as the appellant concedes would be required under the decisions of the Court in Zevalkink v. Brown, 6 Vet.App. 483 (1994), and Landicho v. Brown, 7 Vet.App. 42 (1994) (consolidated with Oseo v. Brown, No. 92-90).

On consideration of the foregoing, it is

ORDERED that the appeal is DISMISSED. It is further

ORDERED that judgment will be entered on the date of this order. Pursuant to Rule 41(b) of the Court’s Rules of Practice and Procedure, this order constitutes the mandate of this Court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

On October 13, 1994, the parties filed a joint motion requesting that the stay in this [127] ease be lifted and asking that judgment be entered against the appellant as the appellant concedes would be required under the decisions of the Court in Zevalkink v. Brown, 6 Vet.App. 483 (1994), and Landicho v. Brown, 7 Vet.App. 42 (1994) (consolidated with Oseo v. Brown, No. 92-90).

On consideration of the foregoing, it is

ORDERED that the appeal is DISMISSED. It is further

ORDERED that judgment will be entered on the date of this order. Pursuant to Rule 41(b) of the Court’s Rules of Practice and Procedure, this order constitutes the mandate of this Court.

Hesse v. Brown, 7 Vet. App. 126, 1994 U.S. Vet. App. LEXIS 871, 1994 WL 587638 (Cal. 1994).

Pincite

7 Vet. App. 126 (Hesse v. Brown) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related