Herring v. Prack
This text of 118 A.D.3d 1200 (Herring v. Prack) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of the Commissioner of Corrections and Community Supervision which found petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.
Petitioner commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding challenging a disciplinary determination finding him guilty of violating numerous prison disciplinary rules. The Attorney General has advised this Court that the determination at issue has been administratively reversed, all references thereto have been expunged from petitioner’s institutional record and the mandatory surcharge has been refunded to his inmate account. As petitioner has received all the relief to which he is entitled, the petition is dismissed as moot (see Matter of Toliver v Fischer, 114 AD3d 984, 984 [2014]). To the extent that petitioner requests that he be restored to the status he enjoyed prior to the disciplinary determination, we note that he is not entitled to such relief (see Matter of Houghtaling v Fischer, 106 AD3d 1351, 1351 [2013]).
Stein, J.P., Garry, Rose, Lynch and Devine, JJ., concur. Adjudged that the petition is dismissed, as moot, without costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
118 A.D.3d 1200, 987 N.Y.S.2d 269, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/herring-v-prack-nyappdiv-2014.