MatterofMartinezvPrack

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedSeptember 11, 2014
Docket517401
StatusPublished

This text of MatterofMartinezvPrack (MatterofMartinezvPrack) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
MatterofMartinezvPrack, (N.Y. Ct. App. 2014).

Opinion

State of New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division Third Judicial Department Decided and Entered: September 11, 2014 517401 ________________________________

In the Matter of JOHN MARTINEZ, Petitioner, v MEMORANDUM AND JUDGMENT ALBERT PRACK, as Director of Special Housing and Inmate Disciplinary Programs, Respondent. ________________________________

Calendar Date: August 4, 2014

Before: Peters, P.J., Lahtinen, Garry, Egan Jr. and Clark, JJ.

__________

John Martinez, Comstock, petitioner pro se.

Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, Albany (Peter H. Schiff of counsel), for respondent.

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of the Commissioner of Corrections and Community Supervision finding petitioner guilty of violating a prison disciplinary rule.

Petitioner, a prison inmate, commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding to challenge a disciplinary determination finding him guilty of drug use. The Attorney General has advised this Court that the determination at issue has been administratively reversed, all references thereto expunged from petitioner's institutional record and the mandatory surcharge refunded to his inmate account. Petitioner has thus received all the relief to which he is entitled and, as such, the petition is dismissed as moot (see Matter of Herring v Prack, 118 AD3d 1200 [2014]; Matter -2- 517401

of Hughes v Venettozzi, 117 AD3d 1248, 1248-1249 [2014]).

Peters, P.J., Lahtinen, Garry, Egan Jr. and Clark, JJ., concur.

ADJUDGED that the petition is dismissed, as moot, without costs.

ENTER:

Robert D. Mayberger Clerk of the Court

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hughes v. Venettozzi
117 A.D.3d 1248 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2014)
Herring v. Prack
118 A.D.3d 1200 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2014)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
MatterofMartinezvPrack, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/matterofmartinezvprack-nyappdiv-2014.