MatterofRadunsvPrack

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedNovember 6, 2014
Docket518742
StatusPublished

This text of MatterofRadunsvPrack (MatterofRadunsvPrack) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
MatterofRadunsvPrack, (N.Y. Ct. App. 2014).

Opinion

State of New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division Third Judicial Department Decided and Entered: November 6, 2014 518742 ________________________________

In the Matter of NICOLE RADUNS, Petitioner, v MEMORANDUM AND JUDGMENT

ALBERT PRACK, as Director of Special Housing and Inmate Disciplinary Programs, et al., Respondents. ________________________________

Calendar Date: September 16, 2014

Before: Peters, P.J., McCarthy, Rose, Lynch and Devine, JJ.

__________

Nicole Raduns, Albion, petitioner pro se.

Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, Albany (Marcus J. Mastracco of counsel), for respondents.

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of the Commissioner of Corrections and Community Supervision which found petitioner guilty of violating a prison disciplinary rule.

Petitioner commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding challenging a prison disciplinary determination. The Attorney General has advised this Court that the determination at issue has been reversed, all references thereto have been expunged from petitioner's institutional record and the $5 mandatory surcharge has been refunded to petitioner's inmate account. Petitioner is not entitled to be restored to the status she enjoyed prior to the disciplinary determination (see Matter of Herring v Prack, -2- 518742

118 AD3d 1200, 1200 [2014]; Matter of Burt v Connolly, 116 AD3d 1283, 1283 [2014]). In view of this and given that petitioner has received all of the relief to which she is entitled, the matter is dismissed as moot (see Matter of Scott v Fischer, 119 AD3d 1307, 1307 [2014]; Matter of Hughes v Venettozzi, 117 AD3d 1248, 1248-1249 [2014]).

Peters, P.J., McCarthy, Rose, Lynch and Devine, JJ., concur.

ADJUDGED that the petition is dismissed, as moot, without costs.

ENTER:

Robert D. Mayberger Clerk of the Court

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Burt v. Connolly
116 A.D.3d 1283 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2014)
Hughes v. Venettozzi
117 A.D.3d 1248 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2014)
Herring v. Prack
118 A.D.3d 1200 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2014)
Scott v. Fischer
119 A.D.3d 1307 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2014)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
MatterofRadunsvPrack, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/matterofradunsvprack-nyappdiv-2014.