Home/Oregon Supreme Court/Herndon v. Armstrong

Herndon v. Armstrong

38 P.2d 44, 36 P.2d 184, 148 Or. 602, 1934 Ore. LEXIS 187
Oregon Supreme Court·Decided October 30, 1934·Published·Cited by 14 cases

Opinions

PER CURIAM.

In this case, the respondent moves to dismiss the appeal upon the same grounds as in Winter v. Heyden, 149 Or. — (36 P. (2d) 183), just decided. The facts are substantially the same in both cases and the same rules of law are controlling in both easés. The motion to dismiss must, therefore, be denied and the appellant will be permitted to substitute certified copies thereof in lieu of the original notice of appeal, undertaking on appeal and judgment appealed from, as in the Winter case, and it is so ordered.

Argued on the merits at Pendleton October 30; affirmed November 27, 1934

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Herndon v. Armstrong, 38 P.2d 44, 36 P.2d 184, 148 Or. 602, 1934 Ore. LEXIS 187 (Or. 1934).

38 P.2d 44 (Herndon v. Armstrong) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Rockwell v. Nelson
970 P.2d 666 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 1998)
Larson v. Trachsel
577 P.2d 928 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1978)
Dean Vincent, Inc. v. Chef Joe's, Inc.
541 P.2d 469 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1975)
Adamson v. Thrall
498 P.2d 379 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1972)
Fullington v. M. Penn Phillips Co.
395 P.2d 124 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1964)
Aldrich v. Forbes
391 P.2d 748 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1964)
Killam v. Tenney
366 P.2d 739 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1961)
Lakeview Drilling Co. v. STARK
310 P.2d 627 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1957)
The Texas Co. v. BUTLER
256 P.2d 259 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1953)
In Re Cooke's Estate
115 P.2d 302 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1941)
Herndon v. Armstrong
38 P.2d 44 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1934)