Vorpahl v. Vorpahl
This text of 224 P. 830 (Vorpahl v. Vorpahl) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Oregon Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
We have carefully considered the testimony in this case and agree with the Circuit Court that the child Helen has not been receiving the care and attention that a child of her situation demands. All things considered, it will be not only for her best interests, but for her present happiness, to be in the custody of the mother.
It is needless to discuss in detail the evidence which was submitted to the court below. It would add nothing to the sum of legal knowledge and be of no advantage to the parties to the suit, to the public, or to the profession, and therefore a discussion of the testimony is omitted.
The decree of the lower court is affirmed.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
224 P. 830, 111 Or. 56, 1924 Ore. LEXIS 110, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/vorpahl-v-vorpahl-or-1924.