Hernandez v. State

212 So. 2d 69, 1968 Fla. App. LEXIS 5255
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided June 26, 1968·No. No. 67-258·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

MANN, Judge.

Appellant was convicted of buying, receiving, and aiding in the concealment of stolen property. He complains on appeal of alleged errors during the trial, to none of which timely objection was raised and none of which is fundamental. Jones v. State, 187 So.2d 915 (2d D.C.A.Fla.1966), cert.den. 194 So.2d 619 (Fla.1967). Appellant also contends that he was denied a fair trial because of the representation by the samé attorney of appellant and a codefend-ant. This contention is without merit because appellant voluntarily engaged the attorney who represented him. Davis v. State, 209 So.2d 701 (3d D.C.A.Fla.1968).

Affirmed.

LILES, C. J., and PIERCE, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hernandez v. State, 212 So. 2d 69, 1968 Fla. App. LEXIS 5255 (Fla. Ct. App. 1968).

212 So. 2d 69 (Hernandez v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Alvarez v. State
287 So. 2d 121 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1973)
Ridley v. State
250 So. 2d 341 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1971)
Jones v. State
219 So. 2d 45 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1969)
Hernandez v. Wainwright
296 F. Supp. 591 (M.D. Florida, 1969)
Financial Fire & Cas. Co. v. SOUTHMOST VEG. COOP. ASS'N
212 So. 2d 69 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1968)