Hernandez v. State
This text of 212 So. 2d 69 (Hernandez v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appellant was convicted of buying, receiving, and aiding in the concealment of stolen property. He complains on appeal of alleged errors during the trial, to none of which timely objection was raised and none of which is fundamental. Jones v. State, 187 So.2d 915 (2d D.C.A.Fla.1966), cert.den. 194 So.2d 619 (Fla.1967). Appellant also contends that he was denied a fair trial because of the representation by the samé attorney of appellant and a codefend-ant. This contention is without merit because appellant voluntarily engaged the attorney who represented him. Davis v. State, 209 So.2d 701 (3d D.C.A.Fla.1968).
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
212 So. 2d 69, 1968 Fla. App. LEXIS 5255, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hernandez-v-state-fladistctapp-1968.