Ridley v. State

250 So. 2d 341, 1971 Fla. App. LEXIS 6287
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided July 20, 1971·No. No. 70-498·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The briefs and record on appeal having been read and given full consideration, and appellant having failed to demonstrate reversible error, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed. See Davis v. State, Fla.App.1968, 209 So.2d 701; Hernandez v. State, Fla.App.1968, 212 So.2d 69; Hammer v. State, Fla.App.1968, 213 So.2d 619. See also Belsky v. State, Fla.App.1970, 231 So.2d 256.

Affirmed.

WALDEN, OWEN and MAGER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ridley v. State, 250 So. 2d 341, 1971 Fla. App. LEXIS 6287 (Fla. Ct. App. 1971).

250 So. 2d 341 (Ridley v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Davis v. State
209 So. 2d 701 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1968)
Belsky v. State
231 So. 2d 256 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1970)
Hernandez v. State
212 So. 2d 69 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1968)
Hammer v. State
213 So. 2d 619 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1968)