Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Ridley v. State

Ridley v. State

250 So. 2d 341, 1971 Fla. App. LEXIS 6287
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJuly 20, 1971
DocketNo. 70-498
StatusPublished

This text of 250 So. 2d 341 (Ridley v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ridley v. State, 250 So. 2d 341, 1971 Fla. App. LEXIS 6287 (Fla. Ct. App. 1971).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The briefs and record on appeal having been read and given full consideration, and appellant having failed to demonstrate reversible error, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed. See Davis v. State, Fla.App.1968, 209 So.2d 701; Hernandez v. State, Fla.App.1968, 212 So.2d 69; Hammer v. State, Fla.App.1968, 213 So.2d 619. See also Belsky v. State, Fla.App.1970, 231 So.2d 256.

Affirmed.

WALDEN, OWEN and MAGER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Davis v. State
209 So. 2d 701 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1968)
Belsky v. State
231 So. 2d 256 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1970)
Hernandez v. State
212 So. 2d 69 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1968)
Hammer v. State
213 So. 2d 619 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1968)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
250 So. 2d 341, 1971 Fla. App. LEXIS 6287, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ridley-v-state-fladistctapp-1971.