Hernandez v. State
This text of 181 So. 2d 190 (Hernandez v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
By this appeal, the appellant [defendant in the trial court] seeks review of a jury verdict rendered against him, finding him guilty of second degree murder and adjudication and sentence thereon. The only point preserved for review was the sufficiency of the evidence to support the jury’s verdict.
We have examined the record and find competent, sufficient evidence to sustain the conviction and, therefore, we are required to sustain it. See: Di Bona v. State, Fla.App.1960, 121 So.2d 192; Hicks v. State, Fla.App.1962, 138 So.2d 101; Crum v. State, Fla.App.1965, 172 So.2d 24.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
181 So. 2d 190, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hernandez-v-state-fladistctapp-1965.