Hernandez v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Hernandez v. State

181 So. 2d 190

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Hernandez v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 1968 Fla. App. LEXIS 5255 →

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided December 7, 1965·No. No. 65-373·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

By this appeal, the appellant [defendant in the trial court] seeks review of a jury verdict rendered against him, finding him guilty of second degree murder and adjudication and sentence thereon. The only point preserved for review was the sufficiency of the evidence to support the jury’s verdict.

We have examined the record and find competent, sufficient evidence to sustain the conviction and, therefore, we are required to sustain it. See: Di Bona v. State, Fla.App.1960, 121 So.2d 192; Hicks v. State, Fla.App.1962, 138 So.2d 101; Crum v. State, Fla.App.1965, 172 So.2d 24.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

By this appeal, the appellant [defendant in the trial court] seeks review of a jury verdict rendered against him, finding him guilty of second degree murder and adjudication and sentence thereon. The only point preserved for review was the sufficiency of the evidence to support the jury’s verdict.

We have examined the record and find competent, sufficient evidence to sustain the conviction and, therefore, we are required to sustain it. See: Di Bona v. State, Fla.App.1960, 121 So.2d 192; Hicks v. State, Fla.App.1962, 138 So.2d 101; Crum v. State, Fla.App.1965, 172 So.2d 24.

Affirmed.

Hernandez v. State, 181 So. 2d 190 (Fla. Ct. App. 1965).

Pincite

181 So. 2d 190 (Hernandez v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related