Hernandez v. State

181 So. 2d 190
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedDecember 7, 1965
DocketNo. 65-373
StatusPublished

This text of 181 So. 2d 190 (Hernandez v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hernandez v. State, 181 So. 2d 190 (Fla. Ct. App. 1965).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

By this appeal, the appellant [defendant in the trial court] seeks review of a jury verdict rendered against him, finding him guilty of second degree murder and adjudication and sentence thereon. The only point preserved for review was the sufficiency of the evidence to support the jury’s verdict.

We have examined the record and find competent, sufficient evidence to sustain the conviction and, therefore, we are required to sustain it. See: Di Bona v. State, Fla.App.1960, 121 So.2d 192; Hicks v. State, Fla.App.1962, 138 So.2d 101; Crum v. State, Fla.App.1965, 172 So.2d 24.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Di Bona v. State
121 So. 2d 192 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1960)
Hicks v. State
138 So. 2d 101 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1962)
Crum v. State
172 So. 2d 24 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1965)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
181 So. 2d 190, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hernandez-v-state-fladistctapp-1965.