Hernandez v. City of New York

District Court, S.D. New York·Decided February 3, 2022·No. 1:18-cv-06418·Unknown

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK □□ eK ANGEL HERNANDEZ and ANA GARCIA, Plaintiffs, -against- 18 CIVIL 6418 (GHW) JUDGMENT CITY OF NEW YORK, MANUEL SILES, P.O. Shield #844, OMAR HABIB, P.O. Shield #844, and DIEGO BEEKMAN MUTUAL HOUSING, Defendants. □□ eK It is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED: That for the reasons stated in the Court's Memorandum Opinion and Order dated February 2, 2022, the Court certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), that any appeal from the order would not be taken in good faith, and therefore IFP status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. See Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962). Defendants’ motions for summary judgment are GRANTED and judgment is entered in favor of Defendants; accordingly, the case is closed. Dated: New York, New York February 3, 2022

RUBY J. KRAJICK Clerk of Court BY: + mango Deputy Clerk

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hernandez v. City of New York, (S.D.N.Y. 2022).

Hernandez v. City of New York (Hernandez v. City of New York) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Coppedge v. United States
369 U.S. 438 (Supreme Court, 1962)