Hernandez v. City of New York

District Court, S.D. New York·Decided February 10, 2020·No. 1:18-cv-06418·Unknown

Opinion

USL OUINY DOCUMENT ELECTRONICALLY FILED UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DOC #: SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK DATE FILED: 2/10/2020 □□ ee KX ANGEL HERNANDEZ and ANA GARCIA, : Plaintiff, : -v- : 1:18-cv-6418-GHW CITY OF NEW YORK, MANUEL SILES, P.O.: Shield # 844, OMAR HABIB, P.O. Shield # 844,: ORDER and DIEGO BEEKMAN MUTUAL : HOUSING : Defendants. X

GREGORY H. WOODS, United States District Judge: The parties are directed to complete discovery in accordance with the case management and scheduling order entered at Dkt No. 41. The parties may request modifications of the deadlines established in that order in accordance with the Court’s Individual Rules of Practice in Crvil Cases. The Clerk of Court is directed to mail a copy of this order and Dkt No. 41 to Plaintiff. The Court certifies under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith, and therefore 77 forma pauperis status 1s denied for the purpose of an appeal. Cf Coppedge □□□ United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962) (holding that an appellant demonstrates good faith when he seeks review of a nonfrivolous issue). SO ORDERED. Dated: February 9, 2020 New York, New York /) NU Deed Keone . WOODS United States District Judge

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hernandez v. City of New York, (S.D.N.Y. 2020).

Hernandez v. City of New York (Hernandez v. City of New York) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Coppedge v. United States
369 U.S. 438 (Supreme Court, 1962)