Herder v. Clifford

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Herder v. Clifford

225 A.D. 780

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided December 15, 1928·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The appeal should be dismissed on the ground that there was in fact a trial of an issue raised by an affirmative defense in the answer; that the [781]*781judgment is without findings or a decision to support it and the matter should be remitted to the Special Term to supply the defects. (Ventimiglia, v. Eichner, 213 N. Y. 147.) Whether there was sufficient evidence to warrant any finding of fact may not be considered now, since the appeal is not properly here. All concur. Present — Clark, Sears, Crouch, Sawyer and Edgcomb, JJ. Appeal dismissed and matter remitted to the Special Term to proceed in accordance with per curiam memorandum, without costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

The appeal should be dismissed on the ground that there was in fact a trial of an issue raised by an affirmative defense in the answer; that the [781]*781judgment is without findings or a decision to support it and the matter should be remitted to the Special Term to supply the defects. (Ventimiglia, v. Eichner, 213 N. Y. 147.) Whether there was sufficient evidence to warrant any finding of fact may not be considered now, since the appeal is not properly here. All concur. Present — Clark, Sears, Crouch, Sawyer and Edgcomb, JJ. Appeal dismissed and matter remitted to the Special Term to proceed in accordance with per curiam memorandum, without costs.

Herder v. Clifford, 225 A.D. 780 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1928).

Pincite

225 A.D. 780 (Herder v. Clifford) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related