Sautter v. Frick

227 A.D. 760
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedOctober 15, 1929
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 227 A.D. 760 (Sautter v. Frick) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Sautter v. Frick, 227 A.D. 760 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1929).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This action was tried before the court without a jury. There are no findings of facts or conclusions of law, and no decision which authorized the entry of the judgment appealed from. The opinion of the trial court cannot take the place of a formal decision. The appeal should, therefore, be dismissed, and the matter remitted to" the Special Term to supply the defect. (Minner v. Minner, 238 N. Y. 529; Ventimiglia v. Eichner, 213 id. 147; Herder v. Clifford, 225 App. Div. 780; Electric Boat Co. v. Howey, 96 id. 410.) All concur. Present — Sears, P. J., Taylor, Edgeomb, Thompson and Crosby, JJ. Appeal dismissed, without costs, and matter remitted to the Special Term to supply the defect. [133 Misc. 517.]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Mason v. Lory Dress Co.
277 A.D.2d 660 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1951)
Fuller v. Galeota
268 A.D. 949 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1944)
Board of Education v. Woolsey
254 A.D. 621 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1938)
Barber v. Singer
235 A.D. 763 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1932)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
227 A.D. 760, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sautter-v-frick-nyappdiv-1929.