Herder v. Clifford

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Herder v. Clifford

227 A.D. 645

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Herder v. Clifford. Read the opinion of the Court — 225 A.D. 780 →

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided June 15, 1929·Published

Opinion

Judgment modified by strildng out the provision for an additional allowance and as modified affirmed, without costs of this appeal to either party. All concur, except Sears, P. J., and Thompson, J., who dissent and vote for reversal on the law on the ground that the evidence was not sufficient to sustain the finding of an accord and satisfaction. Present — Sears, P. J., Taylor, Edgeomb, Thompson and Crosby, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment modified by strildng out the provision for an additional allowance and as modified affirmed, without costs of this appeal to either party. All concur, except Sears, P. J., and Thompson, J., who dissent and vote for reversal on the law on the ground that the evidence was not sufficient to sustain the finding of an accord and satisfaction. Present — Sears, P. J., Taylor, Edgeomb, Thompson and Crosby, JJ.

Herder v. Clifford, 227 A.D. 645 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1929).

Pincite

227 A.D. 645 (Herder v. Clifford) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.