Herb v. Wolfe

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Herb v. Wolfe

41 S.E.2d 817, 75 Ga. App. 20, 1947 Ga. App. LEXIS 464

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedMarch 21, 1947

Docket31535.

StatusPublished

Cited by6 cases

This text of 41 S.E.2d 817 (Herb v. Wolfe) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Herb v. Wolfe, 41 S.E.2d 817, 75 Ga. App. 20, 1947 Ga. App. LEXIS 464 (Ga. Ct. App. 1947).

Pincite

Opinion

Felton, J.

1. If the motion to set aside the- verdict and judgment be construed as a motion in arrest of judgment or to set aside the judgment on the ground that the' petition was so defective that no legal judgment could be based on it, the overruling of the general demurrer to the petition was unexcepted to and became the law of the ease. Georgia Northern Ry. Co. v. Hutchins & Jenkins, 119 Ga. 504 (46 S. E. 659); Palmer v. Jackson, 188 Ga. 336 (4 S. E. 2d, 28).

2. In. a proceeding to foreclose a lien on peal property for the furnishing of labor and materials in its improvement, it is permissible for the laborer or materialman or both to sue the contractor for a judgment in the same action. Royal v. McPhail, 97 Ga. 457 (25 S. E. 512) ; Massachusetts Bonding & Ins. Co. v. Realty Trust Co., 142 Ga. 499 (83 S. E. 210); Holmes v. Venable, 27 Ga. App. 431 (3) (109 S. E. 175); Griffin Brothers v. Gainesville Iron Works, 144 Ga. 840 (88 S. E. 201) ; Columbian Iron Works v. Crystal Springs Bleachery Co., 145 Ga. 621 (89 S. E. 751). Therefore, under the allegations of the second count and the prayers, the legal intendment of the verdict found was in favor of the plaintiff and against the defendant contractor and in favor of a lien on the owner’s property. It follows that the only legal basis for the court’s action would have been a motion for a new trial, grounded on the contention that the evidence did not authorize the verdict. There being no brief of evidence, - the motion to set aside is a nullity if it is treated as a motion for a new trial. Schofield’s Sons Co. v. Vaughn, 40 Ga. App. 568 (150 S. E. 569) ; Dollar v. Fred W. Amend Co., 186 Ga. 717 (198 S. E. 753) ; Crenshaw v. Crenshaw, 198 Ga. 536 (32 S. E. 2d, 177) ; Claughton v. State, 179 Ga. 157 (175 S. E. 470).

3. The court erred in setting aside that part of the judgment which set up a lien on the owner’s property.

Judgment reversed.

Sutton, P. J., and Parker, J., concur. *21 John J. Sullivan, for plaintiff. Robert E. Ealligant, for defendant.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Felton, J.

1. If the motion to set aside the- verdict and judgment be construed as a motion in arrest of judgment or to set aside the judgment on the ground that the' petition was so defective that no legal judgment could be based on it, the overruling of the general demurrer to the petition was unexcepted to and became the law of the ease. Georgia Northern Ry. Co. v. Hutchins & Jenkins, 119 Ga. 504 (46 S. E. 659); Palmer v. Jackson, 188 Ga. 336 (4 S. E. 2d, 28).

2. In. a proceeding to foreclose a lien on peal property for the furnishing of labor and materials in its improvement, it is permissible for the laborer or materialman or both to sue the contractor for a judgment in the same action. Royal v. McPhail, 97 Ga. 457 (25 S. E. 512) ; Massachusetts Bonding & Ins. Co. v. Realty Trust Co., 142 Ga. 499 (83 S. E. 210); Holmes v. Venable, 27 Ga. App. 431 (3) (109 S. E. 175); Griffin Brothers v. Gainesville Iron Works, 144 Ga. 840 (88 S. E. 201) ; Columbian Iron Works v. Crystal Springs Bleachery Co., 145 Ga. 621 (89 S. E. 751). Therefore, under the allegations of the second count and the prayers, the legal intendment of the verdict found was in favor of the plaintiff and against the defendant contractor and in favor of a lien on the owner’s property. It follows that the only legal basis for the court’s action would have been a motion for a new trial, grounded on the contention that the evidence did not authorize the verdict. There being no brief of evidence, - the motion to set aside is a nullity if it is treated as a motion for a new trial. Schofield’s Sons Co. v. Vaughn, 40 Ga. App. 568 (150 S. E. 569) ; Dollar v. Fred W. Amend Co., 186 Ga. 717 (198 S. E. 753) ; Crenshaw v. Crenshaw, 198 Ga. 536 (32 S. E. 2d, 177) ; Claughton v. State, 179 Ga. 157 (175 S. E. 470).

3. The court erred in setting aside that part of the judgment which set up a lien on the owner’s property.

Judgment reversed.

Sutton, P. J., and Parker, J., concur. *21 John J. Sullivan, for plaintiff. Robert E. Ealligant, for defendant.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

41 S.E.2d 817, 75 Ga. App. 20, 1947 Ga. App. LEXIS 464, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/herb-v-wolfe-gactapp-1947.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack