Hensel, Bruckmann & Lorbacher, Inc. v. United States

43 Cust. Ct. 294
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Hensel, Bruckmann & Lorbacher, Inc. v. United States. Read the opinion of the Court — 41 Cust. Ct. 11
United States Customs Court·Decided June 25, 1959·No. No. 63205; protests 244962-K, etc. (New York)·Published

Opinion

Opinion by

Ford, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that certain items consist of narrow woven fabrics, with fast edges, similar in all material respects to those involved in Beer Stern Import Corp. v. United States (39 Cust. Ct. 294, C.D. 1944), the claims of plaintiffs were sustained, and the items marked “A” were held dutiable at 17½ percent under paragraph 912, as modified, supra. The items marked “B” were held dutiable at 25 cents per pound and 25 percent ad valorem under paragraph 1308, as modified, supra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hensel, Bruckmann & Lorbacher, Inc. v. United States, 43 Cust. Ct. 294 (cusc 1959).

43 Cust. Ct. 294 (Hensel, Bruckmann & Lorbacher, Inc. v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Beer Stern Import Corp. v. United States
39 Cust. Ct. 294 (U.S. Customs Court, 1957)