Hensel, Bruckmann & Lorbacher, Inc. v. United States

36 Cust. Ct. 545
United States Customs Court·Decided March 9, 1956·No. Reap. Dec. 8557; Entry No. 973182·Published

Opinion

Lawrence, Judge:

When this case was called for hearing, the record indicates that there was no appearance on behalf of the plaintiff and the case was submitted “subject to a motion for judgment by defendant.”

In conformity with the requirements of the statute (28 U. S. C. § 2631), I have examined the record in the appeal before the court and find nothing therein which tends in any way to overcome the [546]*546presumption of correctness which attaches to the decision of the appraiser. I find and hold that the proper values of the merchandise are the values returned by the appraiser.

Judgment for defendant will be entered accordingly.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hensel, Bruckmann & Lorbacher, Inc. v. United States, 36 Cust. Ct. 545 (cusc 1956).

36 Cust. Ct. 545 (Hensel, Bruckmann & Lorbacher, Inc. v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related