Hensel, Bruckmann & Lorbacher, Inc. v. United States

U.S. Customs Court

Hensel, Bruckmann & Lorbacher, Inc. v. United States

38 Cust. Ct. 408

United States Customs Court·Decided February 13, 1957·No. No. 60485; protest 288822-K (New York)·Published

Opinion

Opinion by

Oliver, C. J.

It was stipulated that the cameras are entitled to free entry under paragraph 1615 (g), as amended, supra, and that the provisions of law and regulations had been complied with in all respects. It was held that the cameras are entitled to free entry and that duty at 20 percent under paragraph 1551, by virtue of paragraph 1615 (g), as amended, supra, should only be assessed on the cost of repairs to the cameras.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

Oliver, C. J.

It was stipulated that the cameras are entitled to free entry under paragraph 1615 (g), as amended, supra, and that the provisions of law and regulations had been complied with in all respects. It was held that the cameras are entitled to free entry and that duty at 20 percent under paragraph 1551, by virtue of paragraph 1615 (g), as amended, supra, should only be assessed on the cost of repairs to the cameras.

Hensel, Bruckmann & Lorbacher, Inc. v. United States, 38 Cust. Ct. 408 (cusc 1957).

Pincite

38 Cust. Ct. 408 (Hensel, Bruckmann & Lorbacher, Inc. v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.