Hensel, Bruckmann & Lorbacher, Inc. v. United States

U.S. Customs Court

Hensel, Bruckmann & Lorbacher, Inc. v. United States

38 Cust. Ct. 408

CourtUnited States Customs Court

DecidedFebruary 13, 1957

DocketNo. 60485; protest 288822-K (New York)

StatusPublished

This text of 38 Cust. Ct. 408 (Hensel, Bruckmann & Lorbacher, Inc. v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hensel, Bruckmann & Lorbacher, Inc. v. United States, 38 Cust. Ct. 408 (cusc 1957).

Pincite

Opinion

Opinion by

Oliver, C. J.

It was stipulated that the cameras are entitled to free entry under paragraph 1615 (g), as amended, supra, and that the provisions of law and regulations had been complied with in all respects. It was held that the cameras are entitled to free entry and that duty at 20 percent under paragraph 1551, by virtue of paragraph 1615 (g), as amended, supra, should only be assessed on the cost of repairs to the cameras.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

Oliver, C. J.

It was stipulated that the cameras are entitled to free entry under paragraph 1615 (g), as amended, supra, and that the provisions of law and regulations had been complied with in all respects. It was held that the cameras are entitled to free entry and that duty at 20 percent under paragraph 1551, by virtue of paragraph 1615 (g), as amended, supra, should only be assessed on the cost of repairs to the cameras.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

38 Cust. Ct. 408, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hensel-bruckmann-lorbacher-inc-v-united-states-cusc-1957.