HENRY v. the STATE.

806 S.E.2d 620, 343 Ga. App. 157
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedOctober 13, 2017
DocketA17A0999
StatusPublished

This text of 806 S.E.2d 620 (HENRY v. the STATE.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
HENRY v. the STATE., 806 S.E.2d 620, 343 Ga. App. 157 (Ga. Ct. App. 2017).

Opinion

Doyle, Judge.

*157 After a jury trial, Timothy Henry was convicted of two counts of aggravated child molestation, 1 two counts of aggravated sodomy, 2 and one count of child molestation. 3 This Court affirmed the conviction on appeal. 4 Henry filed a motion to correct a void sentence, which motion the trial court denied. Henry appeals, and we vacate Henry's sentence and remand the case for resentencing.

Although the record lacks a copy of the sentencing sheet, it is undisputed that the trial court merged the two counts of aggravated child molestation into the two counts of aggravated sodomy and sentenced Henry to two consecutive sentences of life without parole. The trial court also sentenced Henry to twenty years imprisonment for the child molestation count, which the court ran consecutive to the two consecutive life sentences.

1. Henry first argues that the trial court improperly sentenced him to consecutive life sentences without parole on the two counts of aggravated sodomy. Henry is correct that under normal sentencing, a trial court may not impose a sentence of life imprisonment without the possibility of parole unless the State sought the death penalty in *158 the case. 5 Nevertheless, in the case of a recidivist offender in whose prosecution the State has filed notice and certified copies of past convictions, such a penalty may be imposed pursuant to OCGA § 17-10-7 (c), 6 which provides

[Barring certain exceptions], any person who, after having been convicted under the laws of this state for three felonies or having been convicted under the laws of any other state or of the United States of three crimes which if committed within this state would be felonies, commits a felony within this state shall, upon conviction for such fourth offense or for subsequent offenses, serve the maximum time provided in the sentence of the judge based upon such conviction and shall not be eligible for parole until the maximum sentence has been served.

Thus, like in State v. Jones , this sentence was proper

because [ ] under OCGA § 16-6-2 (b), the maximum punishment for aggravated sodomy is life in prison[, and] OCGA § 17-10-7 (a) require[d] that the trial court sentence [Henry]-a [four]-time recidivist-to the maximum sentence. OCGA § 17-10-7 (c) require[d] that [Henry]-a [four]-time recidivist-actually serve the maximum sentence without the possibility of parole. 7

Accordingly, this argument is without merit.

2. Henry also argues that the trial court improperly sentenced him to a 20-year sentence of imprisonment for the child molestation count because the trial court was required to sentence him to a split sentence "with at least one year of probation included in each individual sentence." 8 The trial court failed to do this, and the State concedes that Henry's argument is correct. Accordingly, *622 the trial court erred by denying Henry's motion to correct a void sentence, and the sentencing order is hereby vacated, and the case is remanded for resentencing.

Sentence vacated and case remanded with direction .

Ray, P. J., and Andrews, J., concur.

1

OCGA § 16-6-4 (c).

2

OCGA § 16-6-2 (a) (2).

3

OCGA § 16-6-4 (a) (1).

4

See Henry v. State , 316 Ga. App. 132 , 729 S.E.2d 429 (2012).

5

See, e.g., Velazquez v. State , 283 Ga. App. 863 , 643 S.E.2d 291 (2007).

6

See State v. Jones , 253 Ga. App. 630 , 632, n.2, 560 S.E.2d 112 (2002). Compare with Velazquez , 283 Ga. App. at 863-864 , 643 S.E.2d 291 .

7

Jones , 253 Ga. App. at 631-632, n.2 , 560 S.E.2d 112 .

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Jones
560 S.E.2d 112 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 2002)
Velazquez v. State
643 S.E.2d 291 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 2007)
Henry v. State
729 S.E.2d 429 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 2012)
New v. State
755 S.E.2d 568 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 2014)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
806 S.E.2d 620, 343 Ga. App. 157, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/henry-v-the-state-gactapp-2017.