Henriquez v. LaClair

District Court, S.D. New York·Decided March 13, 2020·No. 1:19-cv-02265·Unknown

Opinion

| USDC SDNY | DOCUMENT ELECTRONICALLY FILED fo Jef) UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT i BOC Ao SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YOR'S DATE FILED: 3{qaGo JEAN CARLOS HENRIQUEZ, EE OS Petitioner, 19 CIVIL 2265 (JMF) -against- JUDGMENT DARWIN LaCLAIR, SUPERINTENDENT, FRANKLIN CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, Respondent. nen ee eee ene ence ene X It is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED: That for the reasons stated in the Court's Memorandum Opinion and Order dated March 12, 2020, Henriquez's Petition is DENIED, and his case is DISMISSED. As Henriquez has not made a substantia! showing of the denial of a constitutional right, a certificate of appealability will not issue at this time. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c); see also, e.g., Matthews v. United States, 682 F.3d 180, 185 (2d Cir. 2012). In addition, this Court certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), that any appeal from the Memorandum Opinion and Order would not be taken in good faith, and in forma pauperis status is thus denied. See Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962); accordingly, the case is closed. DATED: New York, New York March 13, 2020

RUBY J. KRAJICK Clerk of Court BY: Deputy Ge

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Henriquez v. LaClair, (S.D.N.Y. 2020).

Henriquez v. LaClair (Henriquez v. LaClair) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Coppedge v. United States
369 U.S. 438 (Supreme Court, 1962)
Matthews v. United States
682 F.3d 180 (Second Circuit, 2012)