Henderson v. State

496 So. 2d 226, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 2251, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 10226
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedOctober 23, 1986
DocketNo. 86-1543
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 496 So. 2d 226 (Henderson v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Henderson v. State, 496 So. 2d 226, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 2251, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 10226 (Fla. Ct. App. 1986).

Opinion

DAUKSCH, Judge.

This matter is before the court upon a denial of a motion for post-conviction relief. See Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.850.

Appellant has alleged he was denied effective assistance of counsel at sentencing. He says his lawyer never told him he could be sentenced under the sentencing guidelines and that if so he would be entitled to a lesser sentence. See also Hendrix v. State, 491 So.2d 1172 (Fla. 5th DCA 1986).

Because the allegations are sufficient, we quash the order and remand for an evidentiary hearing and order thereon.

REVERSED and REMANDED.

COBB and SHARP, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Brewen v. State
542 So. 2d 422 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1989)
Henderson v. State
504 So. 2d 54 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1987)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
496 So. 2d 226, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 2251, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 10226, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/henderson-v-state-fladistctapp-1986.