Henderson v. State
This text of 496 So. 2d 226 (Henderson v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This matter is before the court upon a denial of a motion for post-conviction relief. See Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.850.
Appellant has alleged he was denied effective assistance of counsel at sentencing. He says his lawyer never told him he could be sentenced under the sentencing guidelines and that if so he would be entitled to a lesser sentence. See also Hendrix v. State, 491 So.2d 1172 (Fla. 5th DCA 1986).
Because the allegations are sufficient, we quash the order and remand for an evidentiary hearing and order thereon.
REVERSED and REMANDED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
496 So. 2d 226, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 2251, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 10226, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/henderson-v-state-fladistctapp-1986.