Henderson v. State

443 So. 2d 500, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 11373
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Henderson v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 10 Fla. L. Weekly 71
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided January 17, 1984·No. No. AT-195·Published

Opinion

WIGGINTON, Judge.

Appellant appeals his conviction, after trial by jury, of grand theft, raising six points for review. We affirm.

Appellant challenges the trial judge’s reading to the jury of Florida Standard Jury Instruction, Criminal Cases, 2.07, concerning appellant’s unexplained possession of recently stolen property. Appellant contends that Instruction 2.07 violates his Fifth Amendment right to remain silent. This issue has been raised and resolved contrary to appellant’s position in Smith v. State, 394 So.2d 407 (Fla.1981) and State v. Young, 217 So.2d 567 (Fla.1968).

We have considered appellant's remaining points and also find them to be without merit.

AFFIRMED.

LARRY G. SMITH and NIMMONS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Henderson v. State, 443 So. 2d 500, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 11373 (Fla. Ct. App. 1984).

443 So. 2d 500 (Henderson v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Young
217 So. 2d 567 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1968)
Smith v. State
394 So. 2d 407 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1981)