Henderson v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Henderson v. State

443 So. 2d 500, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 11373

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJanuary 17, 1984

DocketNo. AT-195

StatusPublished

This text of 443 So. 2d 500 (Henderson v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Henderson v. State, 443 So. 2d 500, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 11373 (Fla. Ct. App. 1984).

Pincite

Opinion

WIGGINTON, Judge.

Appellant appeals his conviction, after trial by jury, of grand theft, raising six points for review. We affirm.

Appellant challenges the trial judge’s reading to the jury of Florida Standard Jury Instruction, Criminal Cases, 2.07, concerning appellant’s unexplained possession of recently stolen property. Appellant contends that Instruction 2.07 violates his Fifth Amendment right to remain silent. This issue has been raised and resolved contrary to appellant’s position in Smith v. State, 394 So.2d 407 (Fla.1981) and State v. Young, 217 So.2d 567 (Fla.1968).

We have considered appellant's remaining points and also find them to be without merit.

AFFIRMED.

LARRY G. SMITH and NIMMONS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI