Health and Happiness (H&H) US LLC et al. v. Nutramax Laboratories, Inc., et. al.
This text of Health and Happiness (H&H) US LLC et al. v. Nutramax Laboratories, Inc., et. al. (Health and Happiness (H&H) US LLC et al. v. Nutramax Laboratories, Inc., et. al.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, S.D. New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Direct Dial: 1.212.906.1821 New York, New York 10020-1401 steve feldman@Iw.com Tel: +1.212.906.1200 Fax: +1.212.751.4864 www.lw.com H A M al AT K | N S LLP sets ee en Beijing Munich Boston New York MEMO ENDORSED Brussels Orange County Chicago Paris November 11, 2025 Dubai Riyadh Dusseldorf San Diego
Hong Kong Silicon Valley The Honorable Lorna G. Schofield Houston Singapore United States District Court eles foe Southern District of New York Madrid Washington, D.C. 500 Pearl Street New York, New York 10007 Re: Health and Happiness (H&H) US LLC et al. v. Nutramax Laboratories, Inc., et. al. (Case No.: 1:23-cv-10849-LGS): Letter Motion to Seal/Redact Portions of Opposition to Nutramax’s Pre-Motion Letter Regarding Summary Judgment and Related Exhibits (Dkt. 347) Dear Judge Schofield: Pursuant to Rule I.D.3 of this Court’s Individual Rules and Procedures for Civil Cases (the “Procedures”), Section 6 of the Southern District of New York’s Electronic Case Filing Rules & Instructions (the “Rules”), and Section VI of the Joint Protective Order (Dkt. 80; the “PO”), Health and Happiness (H&H) US LLC (“Zesty Paws’) respectfully requests that the Court allow to be filed and maintained under seal those portions of Zesty Paws’ Opposition to Nutramax’s Pre-Motion Letter Regarding Summary Judgment (the “Opposition”) that quote, summarize, or disclose information from documents or testimony produced by Nutramax that Nutramax had previously designated under the PO as either Highly Confidential Information — Outside Attorneys’ Eyes Only or Highly Confidential Information — Attorneys’ Eyes Only. Similarly, Zesty Paws respectfully requests that the Court allow to be filed and maintained under seal the exhibits filed in support of the Opposition, all of which Nutramax has previously designated as Highly Confidential Information — Outside Attorneys’ Eyes Only. The attached exhibits are the same as those filed in support of Zesty Paws’ July 8, 2025 Opposition to Nutramax’s Pre-Motion Letter Regarding Summary Judgment (Dkt. 297, “Prior Opposition”). At the Court’s request, Nutramax filed a letter motion to seal the Prior Opposition and the exhibits attached thereto (Dkt. 304). The Court granted Nutramax’s request on July 21, 2025 (Dkt. 305). In accordance with the Procedures, Rules, and PO, Zesty Paws is submitting an unredacted version of the Opposition with the proposed redactions highlighted, with PACER access limited to the Court. Copies thereof have been emailed, as agreed, to counsel identified in Appendix A.
Page 2
Respectfully submitted, /s/ Steven N. Feldman Steven N. Feldman of LATHAM & WATKINS LLP
cc: All Counsel of Record (via ECF)
Application GRANTED. “[T]he weight of the presumption [of public access] afforded to the pre- motion letter is less than that afforded to the summary judgment papers.” Coleman v. Cnty. of Suffolk, 174 F. Supp. 3d 747, 759 (E.D.N.Y. 2016), aff'd, 685 F. App’x 69 (2d Cir. 2017). Accordingly, and since the material has been designated as confidential under the protective order in this case and there appears to be at least some basis for a claim that release of the material “might harm a litigant’s competitive standing,” In re Parmalat Sec. Litig., 258 F.R.D. 236, 244 (S.D.N.Y. 2009) (citation omitted), the Court finds that the presumption of public access has been overcome as to this filing. However, if this material is included in the summary judgment papers and there is a request to file it under seal, the Court will need to revisit the issue in light of the stronger presumption of access applicable on a summary judgment motion. The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to maintain Docket No. 349 under seal and close the motion at Docket No. 348. Date: April 1, 2026
SO ORDERED:
ee a TP HON. GARY STEIN UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Page 3
APPENDIX A
Parties: Health and Happiness (H&H) US LLC Nutramax Laboratories, Inc. Nutramax Laboratories Veterinary Sciences, Inc. Health and Happiness U.S. International Incorporated Attorneys: Steven N. Feldman, Health and Happiness (H&H) US LLC and Health and Happiness U.S. International Incorporated, steve.feldman@Iw.com Matthew W. Walch, Health and Happiness (H&H) US LLC and Health and Happiness U.S. International Incorporated, matthew.walch@Iw.com Michael Bern, Health and Happiness (H&H) US LLC and Health and Happiness U.S. International Incorporated, michael.bern@Iw.com Jason D. Rosenberg, Nutramax Laboratories, Inc. and Nutramax Laboratories Veterinary Sciences, Inc., Jason.Rosenberg@alston.com Uly S. Gunn, Nutramax Laboratories, Inc. and Nutramax Laboratories Veterinary Sciences, Inc., Sam.Gunn@alston.com Alan F. Pryor, Nutramax Laboratories, Inc. and Nutramax Laboratories Veterinary Sciences, Inc., Alan.Pryor@alston.com Mary Grace Gallagher, Nutramax Laboratories, Inc. and Nutramax Laboratories Veterinary Sciences, Inc., MaryGrace.Gallagher@alston.com Natalie C. Clayton, Nutramax Laboratories, Inc. and Nutramax Laboratories Veterinary Sciences, Inc., Natalie.Clayton@alston.com Elizabeth A. Buckel, Nutramax Laboratories, Inc. and Nutramax Laboratories Veterinary Sciences, Inc., elizabeth.buckel@alston.com
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Health and Happiness (H&H) US LLC et al. v. Nutramax Laboratories, Inc., et. al., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/health-and-happiness-hh-us-llc-et-al-v-nutramax-laboratories-inc-nysd-2026.