Haytko v. William Crabb & Co.
This text of 91 A.2d 231 (Haytko v. William Crabb & Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
WILLIAM HAYTKO, PETITIONER-RESPONDENT,
v.
WILLIAM CRABB AND CO., RESPONDENT-APPELLANT.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Before Judges JAYNE, PROCTOR, and SCHETTINO.
Mr. Marshall Crowley argued the cause for appellant (Messrs. Toner, Crowley & Ackerman, attorneys; Mr. Robert A. Vanderbilt, on the brief).
Mr. Harry Cohn argued the cause for respondent.
The opinion of the court was delivered PER CURIAM.
We concur in the conclusion expressed by Judge Francis and reported in 17 N.J. Super. 95 (Co. Ct., Law Div., 1951).
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
91 A.2d 231, 21 N.J. Super. 330, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/haytko-v-william-crabb-co-njsuperctappdiv-1952.