Haytko v. William Crabb & Co.
91 A.2d 231, 21 N.J. Super. 330
Opinion
WILLIAM HAYTKO, PETITIONER-RESPONDENT,
v.
WILLIAM CRABB AND CO., RESPONDENT-APPELLANT.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Before Judges JAYNE, PROCTOR, and SCHETTINO.
Mr. Marshall Crowley argued the cause for appellant (Messrs. Toner, Crowley & Ackerman, attorneys; Mr. Robert A. Vanderbilt, on the brief).
Mr. Harry Cohn argued the cause for respondent.
The opinion of the court was delivered PER CURIAM.
We concur in the conclusion expressed by Judge Francis and reported in 17 N.J. Super. 95 (Co. Ct., Law Div., 1951).
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Haytko v. William Crabb & Co., 91 A.2d 231, 21 N.J. Super. 330 (N.J. Ct. App. 1952).
91 A.2d 231 (Haytko v. William Crabb & Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Graham v. Green
156 A.2d 241 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1959)
O'NEIL v. Bilotta
91 A.2d 231 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1952)