O'NEIL v. Bilotta

91 A.2d 231, 10 N.J. 308, 1952 N.J. LEXIS 248
Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided September 22, 1952·Published·Cited by 13 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The judgment will be affirmed for the reasons expressed in the opinion of Judge McGeehan in the court below.

For affirmance — Justices Olipiiant, Waci-ienfeld, Bur-ling and Jacobs — 4.

For reversal — Justice Heiier — 1.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

O'NEIL v. Bilotta, 91 A.2d 231, 10 N.J. 308, 1952 N.J. LEXIS 248 (N.J. 1952).

91 A.2d 231 (O'NEIL v. Bilotta) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Torres v. Pabon(074307)
137 A.3d 502 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 2016)
Henry v. New Jersey Department of Human Services
9 A.3d 882 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 2010)
State v. Carter
449 A.2d 1280 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1982)
Levine v. Scaglione
231 A.2d 229 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1967)
Wild v. Roman
220 A.2d 711 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1966)
Hickman v. Pace
198 A.2d 123 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1964)
Pawlowski v. Marino
176 A.2d 488 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1961)
Ambrose v. Cyphers
148 A.2d 465 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1959)
Meistrich v. Casino Arena Attractions, Inc.
148 A.2d 199 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1959)
Ambrose v. Cyphers
142 A.2d 239 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1958)