Haynes v. State

571 So. 2d 120, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 9609, 1990 WL 211487
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided December 21, 1990·No. No. 90-01663·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm appellant s conviction and sentence for one count of sale of cocaine. We vacate the conviction and sentence for possession of cocaine on the authority of V.A.A. v. State, 561 So.2d 314 (Fla. 2d DCA 1990). As in V.A.A. v. State, we certify to the Florida Supreme Court the following question of great public importance:

WHEN A DOUBLE JEOPARDY VIOLATION IS ALLEGED BASED ON THE CRIMES OF SALE AND POSSESSION (OR POSSESSION WITH INTENT TO SELL) OF THE SAME QUANTUM OF CONTRABAND AND THE CRIMES OCCURRED AFTER THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF SECTION 775.021, FLORIDA STATUTES (SUPP.1988), IS IT IMPROPER TO CONVICT AND SENTENCE FOR BOTH CRIMES?
SCHEB, A.C.J., and RYDER and THREADGILL, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Haynes v. State, 571 So. 2d 120, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 9609, 1990 WL 211487 (Fla. Ct. App. 1990).

571 So. 2d 120 (Haynes v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Holmes v. State
575 So. 2d 332 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1991)