Haynes v. State

575 So. 2d 1341, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 1606, 1991 WL 27208
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided February 26, 1991·No. No. 90-2304·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

SHIVERS, Chief Judge.

Appellant/defendant, David Scott Haynes, appeals an order directing him to pay $704 in additional restitution to the victim. We affirm the $600 portion of the order, representing 30 hours in lost overtime pay, finding the victim’s testimony to have been undisputed and the award to have been specifically authorized by section 775.089(2)(c), Florida Statutes. However, we reverse the $35 portion representing meal expenses associated with the victim’s travel to the restitution hearing, since the victim testified that the cost of his meals was actually $20. We therefore remand for the total amount of restitution ordered to be reduced by $15.

AFFIRMED in part, REVERSED and REMANDED.

WIGGINTON and ALLEN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Haynes v. State, 575 So. 2d 1341, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 1606, 1991 WL 27208 (Fla. Ct. App. 1991).

575 So. 2d 1341 (Haynes v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Neal v. State
688 So. 2d 392 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1997)