Haynes v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Haynes v. State

575 So. 2d 1341, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 1606, 1991 WL 27208

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedFebruary 26, 1991

DocketNo. 90-2304

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 575 So. 2d 1341 (Haynes v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Haynes v. State, 575 So. 2d 1341, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 1606, 1991 WL 27208 (Fla. Ct. App. 1991).

Pincite

Opinion

SHIVERS, Chief Judge.

Appellant/defendant, David Scott Haynes, appeals an order directing him to pay $704 in additional restitution to the victim. We affirm the $600 portion of the order, representing 30 hours in lost overtime pay, finding the victim’s testimony to have been undisputed and the award to have been specifically authorized by section 775.089(2)(c), Florida Statutes. However, we reverse the $35 portion representing meal expenses associated with the victim’s travel to the restitution hearing, since the victim testified that the cost of his meals was actually $20. We therefore remand for the total amount of restitution ordered to be reduced by $15.

AFFIRMED in part, REVERSED and REMANDED.

WIGGINTON and ALLEN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

SHIVERS, Chief Judge.

Appellant/defendant, David Scott Haynes, appeals an order directing him to pay $704 in additional restitution to the victim. We affirm the $600 portion of the order, representing 30 hours in lost overtime pay, finding the victim’s testimony to have been undisputed and the award to have been specifically authorized by section 775.089(2)(c), Florida Statutes. However, we reverse the $35 portion representing meal expenses associated with the victim’s travel to the restitution hearing, since the victim testified that the cost of his meals was actually $20. We therefore remand for the total amount of restitution ordered to be reduced by $15.

AFFIRMED in part, REVERSED and REMANDED.

WIGGINTON and ALLEN, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

575 So. 2d 1341, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 1606, 1991 WL 27208, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/haynes-v-state-fladistctapp-1991.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack