Haynes v. State

595 So. 2d 289, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 2793, 1992 WL 51258
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Haynes v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 571 So. 2d 1380
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided March 18, 1992·No. No. 91-00846·Published

Opinion

RYDER, Acting Chief Judge.

Carey Vincent Haynes seeks review of the judgment and sentence entered on a jury verdict finding him guilty of first degree felony murder, second degree murder with a firearm and attempted robbery with a firearm.

Only one death occurred in this case. However, appellant was adjudicated guilty of both first degree felony murder and second degree murder. The counts were merged at sentencing and the trial court imposed only one life sentence. We have [290]*290held that trial courts are not permitted to enter an adjudication of guilt for an offense when a sentence could not legally be imposed under section 775.021(4), Florida Statutes (1989), for that same offense. Kurtz v. State, 564 So.2d 519 (Fla.2d DCA 1990). Because only one death occurred here, the case is remanded to the trial court for correction of the judgment to show only one conviction for first degree felony murder. Appellant’s convictions and sentence are otherwise affirmed.

Affirmed, but remanded with directions.

CAMPBELL and ALTENBERND, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Haynes v. State, 595 So. 2d 289, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 2793, 1992 WL 51258 (Fla. Ct. App. 1992).

595 So. 2d 289 (Haynes v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Kurtz v. State
564 So. 2d 519 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1990)