Hawkins v. McDougal
25 N.E. 708, 126 Ind. 544, 1890 Ind. LEXIS 594
Opinion
— There is no assignment of errors, and hence this court has no jurisdiction of this cause. The assignment of errors constitutes the complaint of the appellant in .all eases appealed from the trial courts, and in the absence of an assignment it is the duty of this court to dismiss the appeal. Estate of Thomas v. Service, 90 Ind. 128; Bacon v. Withrow, 110 Ind. 94; Smythe v. Boswell, 117 Ind. 365, and cales cited p. 366; Lawrence v. Wood, 122 Ind. 452.
Appeal dismissed, at costs of the appellants.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Hawkins v. McDougal, 25 N.E. 708, 126 Ind. 544, 1890 Ind. LEXIS 594 (Ind. 1890).
25 N.E. 708 (Hawkins v. McDougal) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Fitch v. Long
64 N.E. 622 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 1902)
Bank of Westfield v. Inman
32 N.E. 885 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1892)
Holloran v. Midland Railway Co.
28 N.E. 549 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1891)