Haugen v. Johnson

283 S.W. 480, 115 Tex. 489
Texas Supreme Court·Decided May 12, 1926·No. Application No. 14668·Published

Opinion

BY SUPREME COURT.

Per Curiam :

The judgment of the trial court was correctly affirmed regardless of whether the testimony of C. A. Johnson was prohibited by Article 8690 of the Revised Statutes. The application for writ of error will therefore be dismissed for want of jurisdiction.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Haugen v. Johnson, 283 S.W. 480, 115 Tex. 489 (Tex. 1926).

283 S.W. 480 (Haugen v. Johnson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.