Haugen v. Johnson
283 S.W. 480, 115 Tex. 489
Opinion
BY SUPREME COURT.
The judgment of the trial court was correctly affirmed regardless of whether the testimony of C. A. Johnson was prohibited by Article 8690 of the Revised Statutes. The application for writ of error will therefore be dismissed for want of jurisdiction.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Haugen v. Johnson, 283 S.W. 480, 115 Tex. 489 (Tex. 1926).
283 S.W. 480 (Haugen v. Johnson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.