Haugen v. Johnson

283 S.W. 480
CourtTexas Supreme Court
DecidedMay 12, 1926
DocketApplication No. 14668
StatusPublished

This text of 283 S.W. 480 (Haugen v. Johnson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Texas Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Haugen v. Johnson, 283 S.W. 480 (Tex. 1926).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The judgment of the trial court was correctly affirmed, regardless of whether the testimony of C. A. Johnson was prohibited by article 3690 of the Revised Statutes 1911.

The application for writ of error will therefore be dismissed for want of jurisdiction.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
283 S.W. 480, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/haugen-v-johnson-tex-1926.