Haugen v. Johnson

283 S.W. 480, 115 Tex. 489, 1926 Tex. LEXIS 160
Texas Supreme Court·Decided May 12, 1926·No. Application No. 14668.·Published

Opinion

BY SUPREME COURT.
The judgment of the trial court was correctly affirmed regardless of whether the testimony of C.A. Johnson was prohibited by Article 3690 of the Revised Statutes. The application for writ of error will therefore be dismissed for want of jurisdiction. *Page 490

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Haugen v. Johnson, 283 S.W. 480, 115 Tex. 489, 1926 Tex. LEXIS 160 (Tex. 1926).

283 S.W. 480 (Haugen v. Johnson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.