Hartman v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Hartman v. State

276 S.W.3d 904, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 165, 2009 WL 364652

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedFebruary 17, 2009

DocketWD 69150

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 276 S.W.3d 904 (Hartman v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hartman v. State, 276 S.W.3d 904, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 165, 2009 WL 364652 (Mo. Ct. App. 2009).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Donald Hartman appeals the judgment of the Circuit Court of DeKalb County denying his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief. Mr. Hartman sought to vacate his conviction for committing violence against a Department of Corrections Employee and sentence of ten years’ imprisonment. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, a memorandum has been provided to the parties. The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Donald Hartman appeals the judgment of the Circuit Court of DeKalb County denying his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief. Mr. Hartman sought to vacate his conviction for committing violence against a Department of Corrections Employee and sentence of ten years’ imprisonment. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, a memorandum has been provided to the parties. The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

276 S.W.3d 904, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 165, 2009 WL 364652, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hartman-v-state-moctapp-2009.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack