Hartman v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Hartman v. State

358 S.W.3d 589, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 175, 2012 WL 456156

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedFebruary 14, 2012

DocketED 96965

StatusPublished

This text of 358 S.W.3d 589 (Hartman v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hartman v. State, 358 S.W.3d 589, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 175, 2012 WL 456156 (Mo. Ct. App. 2012).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Carnell A. Hartman (“Hartman”) appeals the circuit court’s denial of a post-conviction relief motion (“PCR motion”) pursuant to Rule 24.035.

On appeal, Hartman argued that the circuit court erred in denying his PCR motion on grounds of ineffective assistance of counsel at his probation revocation hearing. We have reviewed the briefs and the Record on Appeal, and find no error of law in this case. Thus, a written opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been provided with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order. The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

DISMISSED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Carnell A. Hartman (“Hartman”) appeals the circuit court’s denial of a post-conviction relief motion (“PCR motion”) pursuant to Rule 24.035.

On appeal, Hartman argued that the circuit court erred in denying his PCR motion on grounds of ineffective assistance of counsel at his probation revocation hearing. We have reviewed the briefs and the Record on Appeal, and find no error of law in this case. Thus, a written opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been provided with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order. The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

DISMISSED.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

358 S.W.3d 589, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 175, 2012 WL 456156, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hartman-v-state-moctapp-2012.