McFeely v. State

276 S.W.3d 904, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 153, 2009 WL 364514
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided February 17, 2009·No. WD 69100·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Robert McFeely appeals from the denial of his Rule 24.035 motion, following an *905 evidentiary hearing. For reasons explained in a Memorandum provided to the parties, we find no error and affirm the judgment. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

McFeely v. State, 276 S.W.3d 904, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 153, 2009 WL 364514 (Mo. Ct. App. 2009).

276 S.W.3d 904 (McFeely v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hartman v. State
276 S.W.3d 904 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2009)