Harris v. Tietex International, Ltd.

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-2319

GARY G. HARRIS,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

TIETEX INTERNATIONAL, LIMITED,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Spartanburg. J. Michelle Childs, District Judge. (7:08-cv-03020-JMC)

Submitted: May 26, 2011 Decided: May 31, 2011

Before KING, SHEDD, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Gary G. Harris, Appellant Pro Se. Peter Brendan Murphy, Fred W. Suggs, Jr., OGLETREE, DEAKINS, NASH, SMOAK & STEWART, P.C., Greenville, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Gary G. Harris appeals the district court’s order

granting summary judgment in favor of the Defendant on his

action brought pursuant to the Age Discrimination in Employment

Act (“ADEA”), 29 U.S.C. §§ 621-634 (West 2008 & Supp. 2010). We

have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district

court. Harris v. Tietex Int’l, Ltd., No. 7:08-cv-03020-JMC

(D.S.C. Oct. 28, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED