Harris v. Texas
Opinion
HARRIS
v.
TEXAS.
Supreme Court of United States.
Marian S. Rosen for petitioner.
Carl E. F. Dally for respondent.
PER CURIAM.
The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment of the Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas is vacated and the case is remanded for further proceedings not inconsistent with the opinion of this Court in Jackson v. Denno, ante, p. 368.
MR. JUSTICE BLACK, MR. JUSTICE CLARK, MR. JUSTICE HARLAN and MR. JUSTICE STEWART dissent for the reasons stated in their dissenting opinions in Jackson v. Denno, supra.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
378 U.S. 572 (Harris v. Texas) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.