Harris v. State
291 S.W.3d 378, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 1263, 2009 WL 2849631
Opinion
*379 ORDER
Roy E. Harris appeals from the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief from his convictions of two counts of forgery. After a thorough review of the record, we conclude that the judgment is based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous and that no error of law appears. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. A memorandum explaining our reasoning has been provided to the parties.
Judgment affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Harris v. State, 291 S.W.3d 378, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 1263, 2009 WL 2849631 (Mo. Ct. App. 2009).
291 S.W.3d 378 (Harris v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Matteson v. State
291 S.W.3d 378 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2009)